Seven Days in Solitary [7/02/2017]
Our Weekly Roundup of News and Views on Solitary Confinement
• A legislative commission in Rhode Island, tasked with studying the use of solitary confinement in the state, has reported back to lawmakers and made recommendations for reform. According to one local outlet, the Department of Corrections has already made some policy changes with regards to the number of phone calls permitted to people in the box, and also agreed to track the number of people in isolation.
• “The Onondaga County Justice Center and two civil rights organizations have reached an agreement to curb the use of solitary confinement as a punishment for 16- and 17-year-olds held there,” reported a Syracuse, New York news outlet. Under the settlement, young people will only be placed in isolation in their cells when the sheriff’s office determines that there is an imminent safety risk that “less restrictive measures cannot adequately resolve.”
• Video has been released of an individual in solitary confinement on Rikers Island receiving oral sex, during what was supposed to be a supervised visit. Efforts to reduce the use of solitary at the jail have been met with stiff resistance from the correctional officers’ union, although Rikers has also been plagued by repeated reports of staff violence and misconduct towards people incarcerated at the facility.
• The ACLU of Iowa is petitioning the state’s Department of Education to revise its code for room seclusion, after an internal review found that students were sometimes placed in seclusion for minor infractions, like stepping out of line. “Iowa must update its rules to reflect growing consensus that seclusion and restraints should not be used to discipline or punish children,” Daniel Zeno, policy counsel for the ACLU of Iowa, said in a statement.
• “A Montgomery, Alabama, federal court ruled… that mental health care from that state’s Department of Corrections is so inadequate that it violates the Eighth Amendment,” reported the American Bar Association Journal. Amongst other findings, the judge noticed that there is no practice that prevents people with mental illness from being placed in solitary, and that being in solitary only causes existing mental health issues to deteriorate.
Solitary Watch encourages comments and welcomes a range of ideas, opinions, debates, and respectful disagreement. We do not allow name-calling, bullying, cursing, or personal attacks of any kind. Any embedded links should be to information relevant to the conversation. Comments that violate these guidelines will be removed, and repeat offenders will be blocked. Thank you for your cooperation.