London Calling

by | May 5, 2015

For the next two weeks, Solitary Watch will be on hiatus while my colleague Aviva Stahl and I take a reporting trip to the United Kingdom.

While there, we will be speaking with officials and inspectors of Her Majesty’s Prison Service, as well as prison reform advocates, scholars, and currently and formerly incarcerated individuals. We  also hope to visit several prisons. Our particular aim is to investigate alternatives to the widespread use of long-term solitary confinement, practiced in the United States but virtually nowhere else in the Western industrialized world.

If time allows, we’ll also take a look at some of the icons of the British carceral state, including the Tower of London, where enemies of the crown were once held in extreme isolation, and Pentonville Prison, which has been in operation since 1842 and was built on the model of the U.S.’s notorious prototype of solitary confinement, Eastern State Penitentiary.


Solitary Watch encourages comments and welcomes a range of ideas, opinions, debates, and respectful disagreement. We do not allow name-calling, bullying, cursing, or personal attacks of any kind. Any embedded links should be to information relevant to the conversation. Comments that violate these guidelines will be removed, and repeat offenders will be blocked. Thank you for your cooperation.


  • jay troy

    Pick up a pen!+paper!write to your penpal today, or choose someone random. People often lament”how can i make a difference as just one person?” Well. There’s ya thought for now:-)

  • jay troy

    Welcome to Solitary Watch from the UK!when i read this bit of news i thought wow it’s both exciting and interesting,with S.W. coming to Europe, particularly as a U.K. resident.
    There seems to be more networking of prison reform in the UK now, especially after a documentary was aired about US prisoners on death row. It provoked a massive reaction. I can imagine any report made Solitary Watch, and their experiences here and home, would be welcomed by people like me, and the large amount of people who just don’t know.
    o I’m v.interested about our own prisons.

  • Nil_Darps

    A little background for the new reader:

    Although Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary (E.S.P.) was built before Pentonville Prison, in England, its inspiration can be traced back to London.

    For before John Haviland, designed E.S.P., he had studied architecture in London in the early 1800’s under professor James Elmes who, in lecturing on prison design said, “The external aspect should be made as gloomy and melancholy as possible.”

    Wherever this viewpoint had originated it took hold in the states for when the prison the commissioners went seeking designs for E.S.P. they went on record as saying that, “The exterior of the solitary prison should exhibit as much as possible great strength and convey to the mind a cheerless blank indicative of the misery which awaits the unhappy being that enters within its walls.”

    Thus when Haviland submitted his design he chose a gloomy, Gothic style that accented the security and the punitive nature of imprisonment.

    E.S.P. remains Haviland’s most infamous design which was at the time it opened in 1829 the largest and most expensive public structure in the country.

    In the decades following the opening of Philadelphia’s, Eastern State Penitentiary (ESP), Americans began a building boom of a variety of public institutions; penitentiaries for the criminal, asylums for the insane, almshouses for the poor, orphan asylums for homeless children, and reformatories for delinquents. Absent other social service programs these institutions became the preferred solution to the problems of poverty, crime, delinquency, and insanity.

    Besides ESP John Haviland also designed, Harrisburg State Hospital (HSH) known at the time as the Pennsylvania State Lunatic Hospital which opened in 1851. Fellow Quaker Dr. Thomas S. Kirkbride, M. D. had been in his second year of medical school in Philadelphia when ESP opened its gates and was one of the trustee’s appointed by the governor for the hospital project.

    Dorothea Dix an influential social reformer in the 19th century worked closely with Kirkbride. While visiting a jail in 1841 to teach Sunday school, she had witnessed the appalling treatment of the mentally ill who were forced to live in the company of common criminals.

    Outraged, Dix convinced the legislatures of many states to construct public asylums. Dix and Kirkbride formed a friendship that resulted in a proliferation of asylums based on the “Kirkbride Plan”.

    Ever since, prisons and asylums have shared common methodologies of confinement. Both were sold to the public as being therapeutic, as opposed to simple custodial institutions, but neither system has been successful as abuse, neglect, and mismanagement, soon replaced the reformers high ideals.

    Then, beginning in the early 1950s, there was a major push for the deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill after the abuse carried out in these mental asylums had been exposed. Some of the mental patients ended up in privately run nursing homes using the new 1965 social welfare program, Medicaid, but undoubtedly many others landed in prisons over time creating a growing mental health crisis in these institutions.

    Today the mentally ill are over represented in solitary confinement units where their condition only worsens. The ill effects of solitary confinement became well known after the failed experiment in Walnut-Street Penitentiary, in Philadelphia, in 1787. Even so they went on to design
    ESP specifically for Solitary Confinement. It was later noted in a U. S. Supreme Court on March 3, 1890 that under such conditions, “a considerable number of the prisoners fell, after even a short confinement, into a semi- fatuous condition, from which it was next to impossible to arouse them, and others became violently insane; others still, committed suicide; while those who stood the ordeal better were not generally reformed, and in most cases did not recover sufficient mental activity to be of any subsequent service to the
    community. “

    Nearly a century after this Supreme Court finding the first supermax prison opened for business in Crescent City, CA. Pelican Bay State Prison was specially designed as a supermax prison with isolation of troublesome inmates in mind. The Pelican Bay Security Housing Unit, which cost California taxpayers a quarter of a billion dollars, is perhaps the most notorious state run supermax prison. Pelican Bay’s design most resembles
    the architecture pioneered at Eastern State Penitentiary, PA. From the air it
    is clearly a modern version of the Philadelphia prison: Its hub-and-spokes
    design taken directly from John Haviland’s 19th-century architectural plan.

    Inmates in the SHU (known as “the shoe”) are kept in their cells close to 24 hours a day. As at Eastern State Penitentiary, inmates eat in their cells and exercise in isolated attached yards. But even at ESP, each prisoner had access to an enclosed garden, received writing and handicraft materials, and was allowed frequent visits with clergy and other moral reformers.

    (SHU prisoners, who spend an average of 5 years in isolation, are permitted no visitors, spend 22 ½ hours/day in a windowless steel cell, and are deprived of all belongings and all contact with the outside world).

    After the United States Penitentiary, Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Florence, Colorado opened for business in November 1994 this concept spread rapidly across the country leading to the current crisis where tens of thousands are held for years, many for decades, within concrete tombs designed for maximum sensory deprivation. As I write this 44 states are holding over 25,000 inmates in supermax prisons that resemble Pelican Bay. Another 81,622 are in some kind of restricted housing under similar conditions.

    Second only to the federal government, California holds about 6,000
    inmates in solitary confinement with thousands more locked down in double
    bunked cells. Of these 400 have qualified for a 2012 pilot program to
    transition them back to the general population but only a little over 150 have actually made the that transition.

    One hundred and twenty five years after that Supreme Court finding the legal battle in the U. S. continues even while the international community condemns the practice.

    • jay troy

      Thanks for your info. I’m specially excited about this new project as am UK resident. Be safe+best wishes.j.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Solitary Watch

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading